Prohibit Psychopaths from Occupying Any Public Office [NMO™ Political Policy Proposal]

This first Political Policy Proposal from New Moral Order™ sets the tone for the bullseye politics approach that I will continue to press upon you as the weeks, months and years go by.

Whatever political commentary or critique you’re currently absorbing, it’s almost guaranteed to hit below the necessary line required to turn our society around within the time we still have.

If you’re not adopting a bullseye political attitude to the myriad of problems we face within our wholly corrupted society, you may as well be spending your days reading the front page of The New York Times or The Guardian to know what’s going on in the world, and how to fix it.

Folks, the bottom line is, every single institution that you have been conditioned to believe that you should trust in, is completely controlled and run by individuals who are social-psychopaths or proxy-psychopaths.

In other words, they are either innately void of all empathy, or at least have been conditioned through trauma, programming, corruption and coercion to think and behave to that same extent. They are either innately amoral or they are pathological immoral. The results for you and your society from both these type of personality are much the same – disastrous and dangerous.

As always, I say nothing lightly, and over time, for those who might remain in some denial about this reality, I will prove it to be beyond all reasonable doubt as time passes.

Just as the scum always rises to the top of the barrel, so do psychopaths always rise to the top of a no-holds-barred meritocratic hierarchy.

Put simply, if someone with normal empathy; with a conscience, is given exactly the same advantages at the beginning of their life as another individual who lacks all empathy; has no conscience, the chances are that the latter – the social psychopath – will rise far higher in our present-day society than the former.

Lacking any moral inner voice that tells you that something you are doing is wrong; that you must tell the truth; that you must help a person when they are down rather than to kick them; and that you must respect the welfare and possessions of others, is clearly a huge advantage within a society where those who have no empathy for others have already established the rules of play.

You may think there are laws that govern our conduct, but they simply don’t apply to those who are “in the club”. Above a certain level within the social pyramid, the laws that apply to us no longer apply to those who are willing to follow the psychopathic customs of the parasitic class.

It is only when you break the club rules that your ‘immunity’ is rescinded, and you once more become subject to the laws of nations that rule over the rest of us. When you witness a once powerful figure being suddenly ruined by scandal, this is what is really going on.

At that financially and politically higher – but far more degenerate – level of society, not only is it an advantage to have no empathy; it is an essential requirement. Furthermore, this precondition for all those who occupy the key positions of power to be devoid of empathy ensures a cast-iron sense of ‘honour amongst thieves’.

Each member of the parasitic class is aware of the crimes against society of other members, of which they are all guilty, and so each one is thereby duty bound to protect the rest, in order to maintain the conspiracy for the purpose of self-preservation, and the preservation of the system that provides them with their extreme wealth and power.

This universal complicity in both immoral and criminal acts by members of the parasitic class is well-documented in the testimonies of those who have become whistleblowers or have survived as victims of such crimes. I will be detailing the worst of these crimes in due course, but for now, it is important simply to realise that perverse and criminal ‘initiation rituals’ and ‘oath rituals’ are absolutely central to accessing each level of this ‘club of psychopaths’ that have hijacked our society.

From ‘fagging’ at the public schools of England to hazing at their equivalent ivy league colleges in the US, alongside the now infamous Skull & Bones initiation ritual, these often vicious traditions prepare the individual for increasingly degenerate and downright evil rituals, ceremonies and gatherings in later life.

Of course, for adults, the freemasons are the main recruiting ground in this regard, which sorts the wheat from the chaff within the first three (Blue Lodge) levels, with those who possess the least empathy rising through the higher ever more secretive levels, and taking part in ever more immoral and criminal rituals and events all the way up to the 33rd level (invitation only), which lists within its number only the very worst of the worst of humanity.

Yes, psychopaths really do rule the world, and it makes total sense as to how and why they have managed to do so.

There are 20 elements to the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R), and although I admire psychologist Robert D. Hare who originally devised the checklist for his great insights into the dangers of the psychopathic individual, in books such as ‘Without Conscience’ and ‘Snakes in Suits’, I have come to the unconditional conclusion that just one primary element in that checklist is responsible for all the rest, which are merely potential secondary off-shoots of this core factor.

That fundamental component of psychopathy is a total lacking in empathy for others. Simplifying the condition not only removes its ownership by the manipulating industry of psychology, but it also allows the people to discuss the condition in a straightforward and real way.

If I say to you, “that politician clinically and permanently lacks all empathy for others”, that should be enough for you to realise that they are an outright danger to society.

In order to differentiate this uncomplicated definition from the convoluted version employed by psychologists and criminologists, this wholly unempathic individual is known as a social psychopath or social-psychopath.

For those who readily accept the fact that psychopaths really do run the world, I caution you. My promise to you is that I will ultimately break down every vestige of normalcy bias that you cling to in your worldview, because if you are to be at all useful to the monumental changes that are now required within our society – and it is ‘our’ society, then you will need to experience a great deal of inner work and go through some necessary trauma, in order to begin to perceive the world in its true sense, instead of in the cosy way it has been scripted to you by the establishment.

If psychopaths really do run things, and they do, what is really going on behind the scenes; behind the controlling political stage and the programming silver screen?

As I alluded to above, there is now a plethora of anecdotal and hardcore evidence that collaborating (conspiring) social psychopaths do control all key positions of political and social power – yes all of them.

Particularly over the last 100 years, there has been a focused, systematic, and well-funded agenda to replace all ‘normal’ people in positions of power with those selected for their social psychopathic mindset, and their willing allegiance to certain political and social agendas.

What we must conclude from this is that an ideology, founded in secrecy, and which had at its core a philosophy of total non-empathy towards others, originally planned this takeover of our society.

I need not state that such an entity is clearly a body of pure evil, but exactly which identifiable social group, or groups, have been involved in this ultimate conspiracy will be dealt with in future posts. For now, it is simply important to understand the true scope of the problem and its perilous dangers for us all.

A general overview of the field of psychopathy indicates that there is a consensus that 1-3% of people are psychopathic. The vast majority of them are men. I will come back to that highly interesting point at a later date.

In order to push aside any thoughts of sensationalism, and to focus on only the true social psychopaths who intrinsically lack ‘all’ sense of empathy for others, I will stick to the low end of this estimate, purporting that one percent of people are social psychopaths.

However, it is important to note that sociopaths – or the new definition of proxy psychopath in relation to social psychopaths – often behave in exactly the same manner as psychopaths, the difference being that they have been conditioned by their environment – particularly childhood trauma and mind-control – rather than being inherently void of empathy since birth.

Proxy psychopaths can be rehabilitated (re-programmed, de-conditioned) whereas social psychopaths remain as such for life. Estimates of the number of sociopaths (proxy psychopaths) in society range up to 15%, or even higher in environments such as war zones.

So let’s take the USA as an example. Its current population in 2024 is estimated to be around 340 million people.

If one percent of that population are social psychopaths, that would mean that there are 3.4 million people walking around the United States who perceive other people in the same non-empathic way that you will perceive a computer, or a plant, or a chair.

It is true that a psychopath who is raised under a strict moral code can live their entire life without being a threat to society, but do we currently live in such a society? I suggest that exactly the opposite is the case.

Be in no doubt about the potential way in which these 3.4 million people think. If somebody cut off a baby’s head in front of them in the street, they would not bat an eyelid. That is social psychopathy.

When we expand this calculation to the global 8 billion populace, we find there to be a truly concerning 80 million social psychopaths walking the Earth. On top of this, there is a potential 1.2 billion or more proxy psychopaths (sociopaths) on the planet.

So, if you want to know how a political death cult such as communism, nazism, zionism, the Khmer Rouge etc comes into existence and manages to find enough foot soldiers to rape, murder and cause suffering to millions without remorse, there’s your simple answer.

Hannibal Lecter, the main character of the film ‘Silence of the Lambs’ may seem far too extreme when discussing social psychopaths within politics. Sadly, you would be very naive to assume such a thing, and the evidence shows just the opposite to the case.

This is why I cautioned you above about believing that you have a handle on this topic. Perhaps you really do, but my future posts will put that assumption to the test. As I say, the evidence is far more shocking, and as many would have it, too ‘impossible’ to be the case, for most people to accept it.

That mental defence of denial is within all of us. I’ll be surprised if I don’t push you to that position as time goes on. I can only trust that you are able to push through it, as I have done. Humanity needs you to do that right now.