A posted video, recording the conversation of a woman speaking to a UK NHS 111 Advice Line doctor was published on Monday 17 January 2022.
The number clearly shown on the phone – 01243 831500 – has been confirmed as belonging to St. Richard’s Hospital, Chichester, by the website who-called.co.uk.
A screenshot of the website who-called.co.uk confirming the number on the video to belong to St. Richard’s Hospital, Chichester, England.
A screenshot of the website who-called.co.uk showing visitors’ comments about the phone number, further verifying the video to be a genuine NHS call.
Judging by the available published part of the call, the woman was phoning about her concerns over headaches that she was getting following vaccination.
The conversation lasts just over two minutes, in which time the NHS doctor makes a number of very clear statements about not taking the vaccine, based on medical information that has recently come to light.
We can only speculate as to the exact negative information about the vaccines that she is referring to, because there is just too much to chose from, and it is growing exponentially. Perhaps she is referring to a growing acceptance by the NHS and the UK Government that VAIDS (Vaccine Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) is a clear and present danger to the British public, and to the global vaxxed population. Perhaps she is referring to the charges of there being ‘undisclosed ingredients’ in the vaccines, some of which – such as GRAZORS (Graphene Hydroxide razors) – are potentially lethal, and which have been linked to the myocarditis and other cardiovascular causes of sudden post vaccine death.
One thing is for sure. This National Health Service doctor has no hesitation in warning the caller NOT to be jabbed again. When the caller mentions that her sister is due to be injected the following day, the doctor jumps in and says in earnest, “No, please no, absolutely not! She does not need it, please no.”
“No, please no, absolutely not! She does not need it, please no.”
The doctor’s response to the caller mentioning that her 22-year-old sister is due to be vaccinated the following day.
The doctor also makes a specific warning against vaccinating children and the young. She states, “There wasn’t enough information and it’s a lot more coming up now, and um, especially for young, um, people whose, immunity is intact, uh, apparently that’s enough.”
She also warns against getting your vaccine information from the TV, and says, “you won’t hear it on TV for a while probably, because, ah it’s a long story, but um yeah, so very soon we’ll stop all of these vaccines. People don’t know, but, um, they are not…”
“You won’t hear it on TV for a while probably, because, ah it’s a long story, but… very soon we’ll stop all of these vaccines.”
Was she about to say “they are not safe” but decided against it. She certainly seems to stop herself finishing the sentence. She goes on to say, “If you love your TV, your TV might probably say, yes, get the vaccine, because you know, information does come, but it’s very difficult right now when, um, when uh you know, I mean it’s not available anywhere in this way, okay? The doctor once more appears to be watching her words very carefully here, but what she seems to be skirting around is that the mainstream news and anyone on TV is simply not allowed to release the information that she has been given, and the advice that she is giving out. However, she obviously realises her moral responsibility as a doctor, and therefore must give the correct advice to the caller, and with the information that she has available to her, that advice is to NOT get vaccinated.
Sadly, this information has been around for two years, but much of the evidence was hidden from public and professional inspection by vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer, which has only released the first part of its damning information on its trial adverse events data after being ordered to do so by a court.
The independent laboratory analysis of ‘undisclosed ingredients’ in the vaccines, although thorough, and from multiple scientists, has been completely ignored by both the mainstream media and government scientists. It is so important to understand that there CANNOT be any legally required “informed consent”, if certain ingredients are concealed, or any safety concerns data hidden, from government or from recipients of the vaccine. How many laws have actually been broken, and how many people have died because of any such potential criminal actions?
So is it any wonder that this doctor has only recently become aware the serious dangers attached to the vaccine, when even the record breaking VAERS reports are not being reported on the TV.
We seem to have been existing in an upside down world over the last two years, in which millions of non-medical people know far more about the vaccines than 90% of doctors and health care professionals. What is the point in getting advice from a doctor, if the extent of their knowledge is totally controlled by Big Pharma, vaccine industry, and World Economic Forum interests?
If humanity is to gain control over its society from the criminals, everything must change from this point forward. Nobody – and that includes people like this good doctor who is willing to give medical advice based on what she is aware of, rather than what she is ordered to say – must either forgive or forget the level of subterfuge and deceit that politicians, oligarchs, the vaccine industry, healthcare institutions, and so-called scientists and health experts, have imposed upon humanity over the last two years. We require only moral people running society going forward, not crooks and charlatans.
“There wasn’t enough information and it’s a lot more coming up now… especially for young… people whose immunity is intact… apparently that’s enough.”
The NHS doctor states that the information she now has leads her to understand that those with normal immunity, particularly the young, should not be vaccinated.
TRANSCRIPT
The transcript of the call is as follows. Highlights in bold and underlined are to emphasise the most important points to the reader. Author’s comments are [in square brackets and italics].
NHS Doctor: There wasn’t enough information and it’s a lot more coming up now, and um, especially for young, um, people whose, um, immunity is intact, uh, apparently that’s enough. Okay?
Caller: Okay, so yes I, just sorry, just to make sure, you think I shouldn’t have any more vaccines then?
NHS Doctor: If you ask me this would be my advice.
Caller: Okay and is that just because you don’t think any like anyone should have a vaccine at a young age, or is that because you medically I shouldn’t have it because my head…?
NHS Doctor: Medically… I mean there is very much, as I said to you, there is a lot of information coming up now, which was not available earlier, and very soon all of the vaccines will be completely stopped.
Caller: Oh, OK.
NHS Doctor: This is information that is just really come up, it’s, you won’t hear it on TV for a while probably, because, ah it’s a long story, but um yeah, so very soon we’ll stop all of these vaccines. People don’t know, but, um, they are not…
[She hesitates here – was the doctor going to say “they are not safe”?] yeah, so. Yeah?
Caller: Okay, all right, thank you so much.
NHS Doctor: You’re very welcome.
Caller: And should I be worried about my head at all or just leave it?
NHS Doctor: I don’t think so, no I don’t, I really don’t think you should be worried about your head now okay?
Caller: Okay thank you.
NHS Doctor: Yeah, but any, you know, you know, any sweats, fever, pain, lumps, lumps that don’t get better…
Caller: Yeah
NHS Doctor: Yeah? Or more to come up or pain in the legs, or swelling, yeah?
Caller: Yeah
NHS Doctor: And you probably, if you, if you love your TV, your TV might probably say, yes, get the vaccine, because you know, information does come, but it’s very difficult right now when, um, when uh you know, I mean it’s not available anywhere in this way, okay?
Caller: Sorry, could i just ask you? So my sister’s actually due to go and get her booster tomorrow, she’s only 22. So should I say…?
NHS Doctor: [interrupts with some urgency] No, please no, absolutely not!
Caller: Okay.
NHS Doctor: She does not need it, please no.
Caller: Okay, okay all right, I’ll tell her, thank you.
[END OF TRANSCRIPT]
THANK YOU DOCTOR.
YOU CAN HOLD YOUR HEAD UP HIGH.
THE PEOPLE ARE PROUD OF YOU FOR TELLING THE TRUTH.
You can watch the video on New Moral Order’s channel at Rumble.com.
“Stand for Freedom, Speak for Others, Think for Yourself.”
Quartz
New Moral Order™
NUREMBERG 2™
• Did you know that civil rights (group rights) are always subservient to Human Rights?
• Did you know that true Human Rights are always 'Sovereign'? In other words, they can only ever relate to the individual - equally and without prejudice or favour?
• Did you know that there has been a concerted effort over the last 80 years to remove your Human Rights via the invention and promotion of such things as 'collective rights' (civil rights) and the legalised discrimination against people based on the colour of their skin, their gender, or their religious beliefs, also referred to as 'positive discrimination' or 'affirmative action'?
If you didn't, that's because you've been socially conditioned since birth to see everything in an inverted, false way. 99%+ of politicians, academics and media commentators are no less ignorant about Human Rights and civil rights than the man or woman in the street.
That's why New Moral Order™ sees its aim to educate everyone on the truth about Human Rights as being a pivotal element of its mission to bring about... well, a New Moral Order within our society, in which we are all regarded as 'sovereign individuals' (not simply collective statistical units within a marxist-globalist technocracy). We are all sovereign, with unalienable, natural, divinely established rights.
As those who certainly did understand what Human Rights are once stated, so long as we do not physically harm others in our pursuit of them, each and every one of us has the overriding moral and lawful rights "to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".